<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecep.org.uk/wordpress/constitutional-case/the-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecep.org.uk/wordpress</link>
	<description>CEP News Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.thecep.org.uk/wordpress/constitutional-case/the-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-8585</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecep.org.uk/wordpress/constitutional-case/the-problems/#comment-8585</guid>
		<description>The figures for representation are utter tosh.

&lt;b&gt;England&lt;/b&gt;
Population: 51,092,000 out of 60,975,300 = 83.8%
MPs: 533 out of 650 = 82%


&lt;b&gt;Scotland&lt;/b&gt;

Population: 5,144,200 out of 60,975,300 = 8.4%
MPs: 52 out of 650 = 8%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The figures for representation are utter tosh.</p>
<p><b>England</b><br />
Population: 51,092,000 out of 60,975,300 = 83.8%<br />
MPs: 533 out of 650 = 82%</p>
<p><b>Scotland</b></p>
<p>Population: 5,144,200 out of 60,975,300 = 8.4%<br />
MPs: 52 out of 650 = 8%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://www.thecep.org.uk/wordpress/constitutional-case/the-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-2196</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecep.org.uk/wordpress/constitutional-case/the-problems/#comment-2196</guid>
		<description>the above statement literally makes no sense, just wondered if anyone had picked up on what trevor was saying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the above statement literally makes no sense, just wondered if anyone had picked up on what trevor was saying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Cutler</title>
		<link>http://www.thecep.org.uk/wordpress/constitutional-case/the-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-2064</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Cutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecep.org.uk/wordpress/constitutional-case/the-problems/#comment-2064</guid>
		<description>The main issue about England not having its own parliament is the events that occurred in 1997 and 1998. In 1997 the Princess Diana reportedly died in a car crash in Paris, France and this led to the requirements of the &#039;Diane&#039; legislation and related laws not being met any longer. Princess Diana was named and principally guided by that legislation and I believe it had a connection with a part of Belgium. This situation had an effect on the continuance of England as a state in its own right and we became embodied more into the UK. At around the same time, the &#039;our lord&#039; of Great Britain was deposed after around 34 years in that position. These situations resulted in the drafting of the &#039;Government of ...&#039; Acts, ordered by the United Nations, which gave devolution to Wales and Scotland principally, a few years earlier than would probably have occurred anyway; basically the UK suffered serious problems with finance as England was not a full state by then, so provision had to be given for self-rule of the other nations and Northern Ireland in the UK. As the Queen moved from the majestorial position she had to a head-of-state role in 1999-2000, attending to a role of greeting ambassadors from foreign nations and &#039;a little light dusting&#039;, this led to the inflow of persons to the UK to &#039;assist&#039; with the running and operating of the country on behalf of other nations, including Ukraine, Russia, America, France, Belarus over the next decade until the present time. The intent is to transition Britain in 2009 as required and demanded by other nations providing finance, jurisprudence and oversight as agreed with the World Bank, the IMF, Nato and Unesco.
An English parliament from 1998 would have been very good in principle but it was not to be, as England as a sovereign state had suffered greatly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main issue about England not having its own parliament is the events that occurred in 1997 and 1998. In 1997 the Princess Diana reportedly died in a car crash in Paris, France and this led to the requirements of the &#8216;Diane&#8217; legislation and related laws not being met any longer. Princess Diana was named and principally guided by that legislation and I believe it had a connection with a part of Belgium. This situation had an effect on the continuance of England as a state in its own right and we became embodied more into the UK. At around the same time, the &#8216;our lord&#8217; of Great Britain was deposed after around 34 years in that position. These situations resulted in the drafting of the &#8216;Government of &#8230;&#8217; Acts, ordered by the United Nations, which gave devolution to Wales and Scotland principally, a few years earlier than would probably have occurred anyway; basically the UK suffered serious problems with finance as England was not a full state by then, so provision had to be given for self-rule of the other nations and Northern Ireland in the UK. As the Queen moved from the majestorial position she had to a head-of-state role in 1999-2000, attending to a role of greeting ambassadors from foreign nations and &#8216;a little light dusting&#8217;, this led to the inflow of persons to the UK to &#8216;assist&#8217; with the running and operating of the country on behalf of other nations, including Ukraine, Russia, America, France, Belarus over the next decade until the present time. The intent is to transition Britain in 2009 as required and demanded by other nations providing finance, jurisprudence and oversight as agreed with the World Bank, the IMF, Nato and Unesco.<br />
An English parliament from 1998 would have been very good in principle but it was not to be, as England as a sovereign state had suffered greatly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Johns</title>
		<link>http://www.thecep.org.uk/wordpress/constitutional-case/the-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator>David Johns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecep.org.uk/wordpress/constitutional-case/the-problems/#comment-1992</guid>
		<description>I agree we should have and English/Welsh government which can decide on the policies for England and Wales.  But also go further and say similar to the SNP does for Scotland - and that is, that no person with Scotish or Irish parentage should be allowed to sit on the English or Welsh seats</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree we should have and English/Welsh government which can decide on the policies for England and Wales.  But also go further and say similar to the SNP does for Scotland &#8211; and that is, that no person with Scotish or Irish parentage should be allowed to sit on the English or Welsh seats</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
